There's another example: best arguments against MDIN are 2 year old scandals involving a financing company they were involved with, but it was the financing company that was up to no good, not MDIN, other than a mistake in judgement in doing business with NIR.
2 year old news is not very convincing.
Guilt by association is not very convincing.
On the positive side, clearly verifiable, increasing sales on Amazon are convincing.
Patent deal where Celprogen took stock instead of cash for the rights to their patent are convincing.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
