InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Sal70

08/17/13 4:51 PM

#19891 RE: jmsbravo #19890

I spoke to Anna on wed. and she said TCA is no longer in the mix. They have to deal with IR and want to settle with IR and not go to court and have it drawn out! Anna said before TCA sold to IR. They were trying to make a deal with IR. SVFC backed out because the deal was no good for SVFC. That's when IR went to TCA and overpaid for the shares and are trying to take SVFC Co. away from them(because they are crooks imo). The court knows IR is wrong, but wants them to settle before the 26th.
icon url

cazual

08/17/13 9:18 PM

#19900 RE: jmsbravo #19890

Exactly! SVFC just wants to make sure that if they pay Ironridge ( who illegally purchased the original note from TCA-as you have stated jmsbravo, and I agree), TCA does not come after them for payment of the original loan afterwards.

I think, smart SVFC$$$$$$$$$$$$$