Replies to post #41056 on XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[Ipittydafoo]

Let's hope.

If you read my post lower down on JJs thinking I laid out many reasons why JJ ruled the way he did today.

I disagree this was 'unexpected' news. I believe this 20.9% point was implicit in his granting of the supplemental motion as he did not specify in that ruling what part of the motion he was granting and specify anything he was leaving as an exception.

In law, granting a motion without exception is granting it in its entriety.

Personally, I believe he filed this today in order to speed things up in many respects (read my other post) but moreso to be explicit to google and not allow them to delay by saying, 'well you never really told us outright what the base was"...

If you read my post I do think JJ has done his best now to force google to recognize the pickle they are in and given a very brief timline (10 days) to produce documentation on this ficticious work around it will be interesting over the next week and a half what happens.

If google has any sense, as I mentioned in the prior post, they will find a way to settle before they have to provide this non existant evidence.

If they have a workaround well so be it, the sunset date is when its implemented.

Given no patent application, no 8k on this fundamental change I see it as nothing other than a red herring (common tool in patent litigation) and their leverage is highest before they have to provide info on it if so.