Replies to post #50482 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[success622]

The answers were in the Power Point presentation, available for all to see at the SHM, hear about at the SHM, and for EVERYONE to see on the company website.

[bodreaux]

Exactly where did he say it was insider information and where did he say it HAD to remain private. Why do you always assume or extrapolate the worst?

[cabbie70]

"Prior to the meeting I forwarded a list of 18 questions for their review. I wanted to keep it somewhat quite due to some of the sensitive issues that were brought up. I received a quick reply, but there are a few answers which are to remain private"

Actually he doesn't say that he is privy to the answers that are to remain private.

It could be that Neom put to him that some answers were to remain private;ie they could not answer him.

It could also be that JP was answered but asked to keep it private.

Care to clarify JP ?

[hangdog]

Brew,
I know the questions that were asksed. I also attended the SHM and know that they were pretty much answered at the meeting in the form of the power point presentations.

Privacy doesn't mean inside information. You and your buddy APD seem to have taken privacy to mean special insider information. You have read into a statement and taken it to your own level.

In the meantime, I would like you to send all the private emails you have received over the last five weeks and post them here.

I would suspect that you would not want to divulge all the "company" email you receive each day. Or have you signed a non-disclosure with your company.

Please save the world somewhere else.

[pvc]

When a persons right, hes right. Brewski is right on this issue.
JP inferred he had inside information, whcih I am sure he hasnt, as NEOM management wouldnt be that unprofessional nor would I suggest JP is the type to benefit from it.
Just odd comments from JP, thats all!

[AirPocketDrop___YES]

Concur

There are only three possible explanations for "JP's" statement:

1.) In an effort to infer he is in possession of information not accessible to other shareholders or the general marketplace, perhaps to build upon his "legend" amongst those here and the perception that he is a favored shareholder, "JP" is lying.

2.) NEOM is in possible breach of REGULATION FAIR DISCLOSURE by selectively disclosing information.

3.) Answers to certain question were withheld from JP by NEOM -- "kept private" -- because either the answers would put the company in breach of REG FD or they simply did not want to provide an answer.

[JPetroInc]

Wow. Amazing, truly amazing.

In as simple an explaination as I can provide, some of the questiones I asked NEOM could not be answered. Subsequently, I was told that these types of answers needed to be kept private and were not available for public disclosure due to the QP; nothing more, nothing less people.

Now I suppose some posters here will try to spin something more out of this explaination. Good grief.

All the Best, JP