InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

flapbreaker

08/11/13 12:04 AM

#5630 RE: petermic #5628

Peter, your wrong about the pump and dump. Also, that SA article never said anything about a buyout. It repeatedly mentioned INO and Merck WORKING TOGETHER via PARTNERSHIP. Got it? You seriously believe that Dr. Kim pumps this stock with out being able to back it up? Wake up man.
icon url

pistol1p

08/11/13 12:51 AM

#5631 RE: petermic #5628

petermic,

What is your interest in INO?

Most posters here seems to either be buyers or sellers (shorts), most are not here just looking after the welfare of the of the posters.

Many posters here continue to have over 100% gains in their INO investment. What is your experience with INO?

We know we made a good call investing in INO, it would be interesting to see how your evaluation of INO has related to your success in trading the stock.

So how do we know who has their facts correct on INO? You conveniently believe the critics and call the positive article authors pumpers. If you could take each press release and published trial and point why the data is either faulty or of no value, I might value your posting more.

You are more than welcome to parrot your: "pump and dump" mantra, but if you were to supply some DD, it would not be as easy dismiss you opinions as "ill-informed".