But I think what he's saying is, the profit gained by selling zero cost shares at .0001 is relatively small compared to operation costs. And should they simply be printing or issuing shares as a completely bogus company the reward relative to the risk is fairly significantly skewed. Just bumping it up to the 5's or 6's wouldn't be difficult at all, the risk would be the same (Fraud is fraud no matter what face it makes), and the reward would be far more justified. Wasting all that effort on an elaborate scam to only make a 10th of their potential profits would be pretty stupid (Way more if they really wanted to all out lie, and claim that they have the 43-101 and gold) in my opinion.