InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

feinanddandy

08/07/13 5:32 PM

#95569 RE: Warmy #95557

There are not any Audited Financials in the process, that was a lie from the beginning from GDSM, GDSM would have to go back to the beginning of 2009 and redo ALL of its financials, then resubmit them to the Auditor for final review and approval.

The lack of understanding how Audited Financials are prepared seems to be an issue with GDSM. You simply cannot tell the investors to "Disregard" the previous financials as they were "Incorrect" and expect new ones in to be available in two months. LMFAO!

Not to mention, GDSM does not have any Corporate Tax Returns for the last four years either, how would one propose Audited Financials can be accomplished without them? Economics 101 is a class all of the CEO's, Directors and CFO's need to take.

TOO FUNNY! SNAKE OIL FOR SALE!!!


LIES, DECEIT and REPEAT!
icon url

feinanddandy

08/07/13 6:48 PM

#95570 RE: Warmy #95557

SO THE FACT THAT GDSM LOST A JUDGMENT FOR $4.9M IN JAN OF 2013 AND MARC MADE AN ERROR IN NOT REPORTING IT MEANS WHAT EXACTLY?

THAT WAS NOT AN ERROR, IT WAS A NOT INCLUDED IN THE FINANCIALS TO KEEP SHAREHOLDERS IN THE DARK, THE SAME AS THE A/S JAN 2012 SHARE INCREASE TO 2B.

Yea, I'd believe GDSM is headed in a new direction if I were invested here. LMAO

P.S. The new CEO has not a clue as to how many errors there are, it'll take months if not years to go through it all and find them. If I were the new CEO, I'd begin with the missing Corporate Tax Returns from 2009 and go from there. When Mr. Shea gets to 2012 and sees another 295,000,000 shares missing from the financials, he'll probably quit, if he is as smart as some claim he is.