InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DavesnotHere

08/07/13 10:25 AM

#5231 RE: mmrich1 #5228

I agree with the illegal statement, that's manipulation at its finest. I think it should be up there with insider trading, especially if you are short/long.
icon url

plain_ole_pain

08/07/13 11:01 AM

#5234 RE: mmrich1 #5228

If you noticed his reply to me is that he responds to me by saying "while I don't agree with it, at least you're trying to give INO a valuation ($324M + electroporation)."

So looking at from a lawyer perspective he's never putting a true valuation on the company outright. Because it's hidden behind his title that way he can say whatever he likes. Because it's not a true valuation of the company and he never applied in the article it was a true valuation peace. He just thinks it's "overextended" giving him all the wiggle room he needs to manipulate his selected information.
icon url

MiamiGent

08/07/13 12:22 PM

#5267 RE: mmrich1 #5228

INO down 25% @ 12 noon
Innocents dragged into this illegal pump & dump are mounting and getting financially devastated.
Three big dumps by the pumpers averaging 24% each over last eight days.
Unconscionable.
MG


Amit Ghate of the SA article is a truth teller.
icon url

petermic

08/07/13 12:51 PM

#5280 RE: mmrich1 #5228

How is a negative article by a short any less ethical than a positive article by a long?

The article was full of factual information that is rarely found on this board. The fact is that INO has been attempting to make progress with this technology for many years without success to date - a fact not often mentioned on this board.