Dacaw: "In short its not that AMD delayed the shift to 65nm but rather 65nm is not the answer to what AMD wants. SiGe DSL *IS* what it wants. When more chips are needed, late in 2006/2007 then AMD can shift to 65nm and do it at a more leisurely and measured pace."
Nice summary. It would be super to have it done all at once, but much too risky, and I trust Hector and team to set the right priorities. It would be nice to know the timeline for implementation of these processes though.
Seems AMD vs Intel in 2006 will be like a little league ball game, - whoever screws up the least, wins......
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
