I read the settlement proposal filed with the District court in NY. There seemed to be an inconsistency in that in one part of the document it was mentioned that BMG would not make any more CDs with copy protection for two years and then in another part it was mentioned that BMG would do A, B and C when using copy protection. I could not reconcile the inconsistency but can only assume that the Exhibit to the document (the actual settlement agreement) which was the agremement between the parties (and not the motion which was filed with the court) will set forth what the parties agreed to in more detail.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
