InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

CC-HAMMER

08/01/13 1:28 PM

#15503 RE: Reindeer830 #15501

lol....Agree that FINANCIALS will be determining factor on PPS, not the charts and offspring of the charts, and extended family of the charts second cousins.
SVFC price range you suggest is reasonable on P/L with some revenue generation.
icon url

TheSkunk

08/01/13 1:35 PM

#15504 RE: Reindeer830 #15501

I like that! Baby bulls! LOL!

Let's face it, we've built up expectations, been let down, built up and so on a lot just since I've been here in early July. I think we're getting to that mentally frustrated point.

I don't want us to forget that there could/should be some very positive things in the updated filings. I think Hammer pointed it out earlier but if it was someone else then I'll apologize and give credit where it was due, but we should be seeing Revenues. How much in the way of revenues and from what sources will determine how far we go up if any.

There can still be negatives in these filings. Some we have an inkling about and possibly new ones. But IMO, if we weigh the pros and cons I believe the potential of the pros outweighs the risks of the cons based on what information and data is available to us at this moment. That in no way means any con will not have a negative impact on the company or PPS now or in the future, especially if a new situation were to arise.

If the company didn't have a process with science that was currently treating patients I could easily fall into the bearish camp. But I can't because the process and science are here and is not going to go away. It just may take some time. How much is always the question.

To anyone (I know Reindeer is a long), if you like the company and believe in the process and science used to treat people then buy the stock. If you're a flipper you don't care about this stuff anyways!