rwandrw-the case may be that individuals have exchanged email with Marriott and it could be she is responding with a sanguine picture. I doubt she would paint a negative one. Whatever she is communicating and with however much subtlety, if it can be construed positively, she evidently chooses NOT to communicate to ALL shareholders.
Beyond the price performance (lack thereof) under her watch, it is her abysmal communication ledger since becoming CEO that is the stone in my other shoe.
I'll be very happy to eat my shoe, chewing every bite 30 times, should I be proven wrong. Nobody wants failure for failure's sake, and this is why shareholders are 'bladerunning'. Are these people worthy of a 3rd chance?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
