Replies to post #133460 on Sarissa Resources Inc (SRSR)

[es1]

Well it is extremely hard to make a question that wont lead to discussion. But IMO the first question is what did they spend it on? There is no discussion about the money spent if he tells us what it was spent on.

If we ask him how many holes he drilled and he responds with "one" we have no choice but to ask "where did the rest go?" or discuss why 1 hole costs so much and why they didnt PR it.

So I can only ask what was explored for the $788K?

"It's a reclassification of the flow-through credits."

I am no financial wiz so I do not see how any form of credit becomes exploration. I do not know near enough to see how that works.

Being ignorant of the works of flow through credit make me unsure of the facts of that statement but it sounds like a line of crap IMO.



I appreciate that they may be willing to answer a question but to give the shareholders restrictions on the question seems inappropriate. Like a genie giving away a wish you have to think the wish through to be sure you ask exactly right or the genie will give you something other than what you expect.

With that in mind I would only be able to ask... What was explored and what did it cost?
Interestingly that is exactly what the 10K is supposed to answer and didnt.


If you or Dmbao can come up with a better question or way to word it I will be glad to hear any response from the company but I doubt it will be more than the typical boiler plate answer. Anything other than a boiler plate comment would require a PR.

[show-da-money]

How about we ask where the private placement money is that was raised through the sale of shares for Shining tree?

Or where is the money from the sale of Shining tree claims to Joshua Gold?

Or why he keeps paying Merle when an answering machine could do the same job?
Or why he can't address shareholders like a grown up? I guess being a child with a silver spoon removes him from culpability.

Or we could ask when he plans to actually have some success doing something.
I am sick of Scott's apathy towards shareholders who have to great pains to themselves been loyal and held through all the failures with belief he would succeed. So far anyone believing in Scott has been shut out of all the profit that could have been made in the name of loyalty, maybe a little in return is in order. Scott is starting to look like any other shady pink stock CEO. Line your pocket with fake presses and take a generous salary to fail without as much as a word to the people you have taken down in the process. I used to believe Scott was beyond reproach, but only crooks need to hide, and he has been hiding for years. IMO Sorry, my yearly vent is completed.