InvestorsHub Logo

d4diddy

12/22/05 8:06 PM

#6384 RE: Crow3 #6382

Crow, good question, I don't think so.

The examiner stated "at least one meter" was acceptable as the amended claims currently stand.

When you read the actual patent details it states 1-2 meters but with a lot of wiggle room depending on various factors.

I don't think they give any definite correlation between stand-off, integration time, target concentrations... etc. That'd be hard to do without getting specific.

Not 100% sure though, my attention has been on the claims. I haven't read the detailed description very carefully.