Replies to post #19 on Poster Filtering (IGNORE)

[Cassandra]

Bob: I am in complete agreement.

"Crapper" seems to be an alternative term for "basher," AKA anyone who disagrees with the prevailing hype.

[gotmilk]

re: iHub having ala-carte subscription items

Bob,

My message here will use Churak's reply, as follows.

Churak's reply to himself in Public: (msg# 2)
"... against filtering. Period.
I am a premium member & have no one on filter..."

For myself,
1.
On Silicon Investor i have one person on Ignore "Friendly Fire"
with full intentions to eventually go back and read ALL his posts
that i missed reading. Note: not the normal reason for an Ignore
2.
On the Raging Bull board HABE i have 78 people on Ignore
that includes idiots, bashers, hypers & friendlies
and yes, this board for me has become sicko & worthless
3.
Here on iHub i have zero on Ignore/Filter and hope you and Matt
can develope iHub in a non Raging Bull direction such that the
necessary reasons for Ignore/Filter are removed(aka TOU violators)

Thats why i believe Churak's reply: "... against filtering. Period."
is the key & focus here,
NOT
your (From BobZ)
Then we completely and utterly disagree about the definitions
of "crapper" and "quality content". [stop.]
since,
That issue is only an issue when iHub has Raging Bull attributes,
which include either or both non existance Administration folks,
and clueless or misguided Administration folks.
yes,
it all a work in progress to make iHub "The best it can be."
or,
A need for Ignore/Filtering reflects a problem that may exist
in many places, included OR(s) and AND(s) of posters, readers,
and yes even you and Matt.

doug