InvestorsHub Logo

steve accountant

07/05/13 4:24 PM

#20572 RE: Dt0120 #20571

Yes Dt0120,

The insiders always dump their shares..and they want Bork to remain in business long enough to dump the remainder of the shares.

Some people think the insiders are just selling shares to pay bills, and tax purposes and so forth and don't understand that isn't the case.
Insiders want to dump dump shares before the stock goes to zero cents or before the company goes bankrupt.
There is a good reason why not a single insider has "EVER" spent a single penny buying a share of Bork at open market price.

Also the cash infusion, which starts out at 55k or something a month??? Not sure about the amount. Keep in mind management wants Bork to stay in business longer to so they can keep getting free shares of stock to then sell.
Also that monthly cash infusion is likely also being spent to pay managements wages/bonus etc..If people think the cash infusion is just going to purchase materials instead of finding it's way inside Bork's management's pockets...think again.
And anyone that has loaned them money just wants Bork to stay in business long enough to dump their shares as well.


In the Ironbridge lawsuit that was filed last year against Bork, it was interesting (yet predictable) to see just how many of Bork's bills, that Bork didn't pay..

Then again...A company with barely any sales..should not be using/renting private jets...but it's not their money it's the shareholders equity going down the tubes.

Management is self-serving..it cares about itself as an entity..It doesn't care about it's shareholders, as long as Bork can keep fooling it's shareholders.

Flatcat

07/11/13 4:04 AM

#20590 RE: Dt0120 #20571

The misinformation you provided on Rule 144 is 100% wrong! Anyway, anyhow. Amendments for unsold stock are NOT required!

Please refer to Hamilton & Associates website for the correct information. They are securities attorneys.

[url]http://www.securitieslawyer101.com/rule-144/