Replies to post #21211 on CirTran Corporation (CIRX)

[usmcvet_slim]

Well the in favors have allowed continued use of the trade mark, so some judge somewhere obviously agrees with Cirtran.

[MONEYMADE]

,,,,,,,NASCOW...YOU ARE REALLY SMART. WELLL DOGGY! I CAN TELL YOU HAVE GOOD EDUMACATION. THATS WHAT IVE BEEN SAYING

YOU CAN TOSS UP ANY PROCEDURAL MOTION AND CALL IT A VICTORY!!!!

WITHOUT A MONETARY JUDGEMENT ITS NOT WORTH A HILL A BEANS TO CIRC....

BUT SURE MAKES GOOD FOR PUMPING 4 PRS TO UNLOAD DILUTION.

note the fact there has been NO settlement...don't confuse "in favor of" with simple procedural judgements / decisions [none of which really lend credence to a real victory - some here are applying thse 4 decisions the same way they pumped "settlement tomorrow" a few months ago]...there's only one decision worth anything to CIRC and shareholders; and there's NO definitive certainty it will go in favor of