InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Truthbythought

06/23/13 12:23 PM

#35340 RE: believer20 #35338

I like our odds. The effect on tissue at a cellular level by K and the success of animal models at predicting Psoraisis success tells me that the odds are on out side. Low toxicity in dogs of K which had been and continues to be our biggest risk factor (since we know on a cellular level this thing is highly disruptive to cancer) makes me extremely confident in success.
icon url

MinnieM

06/23/13 1:27 PM

#35343 RE: believer20 #35338

Dr Menon runs Kard Scientific. He has a good idea what does and doesn't work when testing with various models. Kard does pre clinical testing for many companies. His experience increases the probability of kevetrin and/or prurisol working in humans. He has put his money where his mouth is since he believes it will work. I like the odds here.

http://www.kardscientific.com/Services_FJJR.html

Instead of diluting the shareholders to take a salary he and Leo have basically financed the company. They seem to believe the odds are very high of kevetrin or prurusol working. I'll be happy with just one of them working in humans. I'll be ecstatic to find that both do.

There are eight drugs in the pipeline and a new one being added.

I invest what I can afford to lose if neither works and the price drops. But, I like the risk/reward odds here.

Good luck whether or not you decide to invest here or elsewhere. ;) I can see why you might fear biotech. ;)






icon url

macnqueso

06/23/13 3:29 PM

#35347 RE: believer20 #35338

"because testing on animals has no bearing on what the potential is for humans"

ok... if you want to make the point that pre-clinical testing outcomes do not always match clinical outcomes... i would agree... it is an obvious point imo... but if that is the point you want to make i am ok with it... but to say it has "no bearing" is way over the top...

Menon is a lab rat... he has cut his eye teeth in pre-clinical... he has a gifted eye for spotting marketable indications which will translate from pre-clinical to the clinical to the market... he has a track record to prove it... i am not saying he is going to hit on 100%... but he is not going to bat zero either... Doc Menon is up and the bases are full... i like the odds...
icon url

alwaysdreaming

06/23/13 5:24 PM

#35351 RE: believer20 #35338

Good question,,, cause I asked the same one a few months ago. Dude/dudette, years ago using lab animals prob wasn't anywhere as accurate when predicting the effect the drug will have on humans. Technology is so advanced and Kard/CTIX has so much experience with Dr Menon analyzing the equation, plus add a few Harvard grads to the equation and WAH LA.

Bet half the farm
icon url

vip1999

06/24/13 2:04 AM

#35358 RE: believer20 #35338

you basically answer your own questions.
you seems to know testing on animals has no bearing on what the potential for human. Why ask anyone if you already know.

anyone can tell you their opinions, do you really want to hear it? since you already know animal testing and human testing have no bearings, form your own opinions and say it out like you want to say it.

by the way, I am all for not testing drugs on animals, if the drug was meant for human, why use an animal to make it sick and then test the drug??! Hopefully one day, human can come up with a process to solve our own problem without involving other lifes...ofcourse, that is another subject for another time.

I can't tell you mine opinions because I am still dreaming of upwards of $50 per shares for this stock. My opinions are heavily bias!!! :)