Interesting article on the surface and leaves a lot of questions to be answered.
35 YEARS OF TEACHING,OVER 50 YEARS OF INVESTING,ALONG WITH PHILOSOPY 400 AND PSYCHOLOGY 400 COURSES INDICATES TO ME THAT:
For example:
Was/is Microsoft/Skype using its version of Lawful Intercept (Legal Intercept) to facilitate "CHESS"? Remember, even though MS doesn't have the patent doesn't mean they don't have the technology and aren't using it.
THEY WOULD HAVE HAD TO HAVE USED THEIR ONLY DEVELOPED,PATENT PENDING ,AND REJECTED VERSION OF LI TO SCOOP INFORMATION. THEY WILL HAVE,WHEN VPLM FINALLY COMPLETES THE PURCHASE OF THE 5 PATENTS, BE THEN INFRINGING VPLM'S PATENT. /
And, if MS/skype were/are using LI, does the government granted "plausible deniability and pass on being held liable for client data disclosures" apply to patent right infringement as well?
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!COURT CASE WOULD DETERMINE..........
If it does, then VP would lose a lot of it's legal recourse on LI patent infringement. I mean how do you prove the other side is infringing if the government says MS/Skype doesn't have to talk about it (MS/skype can plea the 5th) and can't be held liable for it?
I BELIEVE THAT VPLM IN A NEWS RELEASE SAID THAT 75% OR MORE OF THE PATENTS HAD THE SAME CONTENT AND THAT 20 DEVELOPERS WERE HIRED AND 15 MILLION DOLLARS SPENT IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THESE 5 PATENTS.
I WOULD IMAGINE THAT SOME,PERHAPS ALL, OF THE DEVELOPERS WERE THEN PROBABLY HIRED BY MICROSOFT AFTER THEY WERE THROUGH AND THEY COBBLED TOGETHER M/S'S REJECTED LI PATENT VERSION......EXAMINATION FOR DISCOVERY, IF ANY DEVELOPERS WERE HIRED BY M/S, ETC, WOULD DETERMINE WHAT DID OCCUR...
Ughhh!
THAT IS WHY I BELIEVE THAT MS, GATES, SKYPE HAVE TO BUY OUT VPLM ONCE THE BIDDING STARTS IN EARNEST.
INTERESTING TURN OF EVENTS....VERY POSITIVE FOR VPLM
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
