InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

arstegall

06/16/13 11:11 AM

#60308 RE: dandaman53 #60307

Dandaman53, From what I am reading I think it could clearly be thought that the claimants don't have a judgement according to the quote on your post. They way one understands things may not always be right as in this example
QuoteTDBowieknife

If the leases lose the P-4 certificate they cannot get a new one while under a TNR 91.114 Flag. I was under the impression that if a operators P-5 becomes delinquent then the P-4's under that operator are no longer valid. Looks like I was wrong and Treaty can transfer the leases that are not under Severance and have a valid P-4 certificate.

It seems to me that one does not always understand things in the correct manner. All I am saying is lets let the court handle it and then we can talk about what happened, not what we think will or want to happen. JUST FACTS!!


icon url

kanola

06/16/13 12:48 PM

#60318 RE: dandaman53 #60307

And now I get more confused. Why would one who already has a PRE-JUDGEMENT go back to Court to get a JUDGEMENT ?

An EXPERIENCED LEGAL TEAM would know to go to an collection agency and try to recoup the monies owed. Wonder if this FAKE CASE will be DISMISSED quicker than the WORLD RECORD PHONY BK 7

The plaintiff's gonna have some " splainin to do "