You are correct TD it was a prior procedural mis-step that did not allow Mr. Laurent's motions to move forward or be argued. That is why the order says his motions were moot. I am sure the attorney is looking at those issues and deciding whether to refile immediately or to get others involved for whatever was missed. My bet is this is far from over. SmackDown
IMO what happened in court was the case never should have been there in the first place. A waste of the court's time. If the attorney did not have a clue that the court must have proof of service on file, I'd say there's the answer. A poor choice of legal council. I heard that not even all the witnesses testified it was so bad. lol
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
