InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

pennypicker42

06/06/13 1:24 PM

#22263 RE: Kingrudy #22262

I see completion of part 4 of the military contract as proof that there is an engine and that it getting the refinement it needs.
I'm sure my posts seem one sided but that matches what I'm replying to. I understand the reason for anger and disappointment and I feel them too, every time my share get smaller.
As long as I see comments like "There is NO engine" I feel compelled to show another side.
I have read your link but don't understand the problem. I am interested in your point. I really am here to be informed.
Thank you for your time.
icon url

littemickey

06/06/13 3:25 PM

#22266 RE: Kingrudy #22262

Sorry King you are correct. Product then profits. You can however still have a product and end up without a profit. I think managment at Cyclone needs to write position papersso we can understand how they make decisions.