InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

B402

05/29/13 3:51 PM

#217514 RE: TinkerBelle #217510

Pink Shares are Worthless

Katx is worth 119K
icon url

eelfland

05/30/13 7:44 PM

#217549 RE: TinkerBelle #217510

Ahhh. Thanks. Referencing my previous post, that means that by selling KATX and buying BVIG with the money, you're likely to be getting more like SIX times the BVIG for your buck, instead of only two.

I don't see why anybody wouldn't do that, given the numbers we're looking at.
icon url

eelfland

06/12/13 8:12 PM

#217903 RE: TinkerBelle #217510

That's a forward-looking statement regarding those BVIG shares. Never validated. Just a promise. No filings. Kennay's record regarding promises and forward-looking statements is very bad. As far as we know, KATX is AT BEST an empty shell.
icon url

eelfland

08/05/13 12:34 PM

#218675 RE: TinkerBelle #217510

That's a forward-looking statement you quoted. We all know what happens to Kennay's forward-looking statements. There is no evidence that KATX ever actually GOT those shares (not that they're worth much) even after all this time, or that if KATX did get the shares, that they weren't sold as soon as possible.

Ol' Kennay isn't in the habit of giving shareholders much to be happy about, is he?
icon url

eelfland

08/25/13 2:00 PM

#219495 RE: TinkerBelle #217510

There's a really big flaw in that statement. You say "was given" based on a forward-looking statement. There is no evidence of which I am aware that those shares were ever delivered, and if they were, that they were not dumped as soon as they were in hand. There is no evidence of which I am aware to support the idea that KATX is anything other than an empty, non-reporting shell.

If you have any evidence of that nature, a lot of us would like to see it. Assuming anything to be a fact based on one of Kennay's forward-looking statements has repeatedly and reliably proven to be a good way to be wrong.