Exactly the kind of BS that lost us the merger vote. They needed 67% ,they got just 73%. Don't say it couldn't of gone the other way. The unethical move of using a PR to dissolve voter confidence against the merger might just be used again,then again why bother ,they have Firecracker.
How do we know some of the bigger players won't vote against the board ? Sprott and the other close insiders might have 20%.
This stock is heavily controlled by retail and anybody that can read or has even the slightest gram of intelligence knows the merger was bad and generally somebody down the line has to be responsible to retail shareholders. The Annual election of officers seems to be a good place to start.