InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

NlikeFlynn

05/15/13 4:47 PM

#34297 RE: running bull #34296

I would think so. Good question?
icon url

Realizer

05/15/13 4:58 PM

#34298 RE: running bull #34296

I think MSFT understood this when the jury ruled. Therefore the talks ensued. The hold up of course is dependent upon RR ruling against G. That away both sides have a base to negotiate on. They could delay talks till appeals are final but I think V will push them to settle or continue with court proceedings. IMO of course.

Edit: addition

ZTE is another animal on it own seeing how it is in the UK different rules apply.

http://www.vringoip.com/documents/FG/vringo/ip/12310_ZTE_Complaint_December.pdf
icon url

tobinator00

05/15/13 7:28 PM

#34317 RE: running bull #34296

From my reading, a workaround design means absolutely nothing. The infringer has to cease using the patented technology. In this case, Google will have to implement the workaround to no longer infringe Vringo patents. Note, it would have to be shown convincingly that none of the claims with the implemented workaround to be cleared of royalties.

NewCoin, when I get some time probably tomorrow I'll post your requested TA and other observations.