Replies to post #34255 on XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[chestnut42]

From the VRNG forum is this. I am not a geek, so I found someon who is. Animal60 writes,

"I AM a techie...as well as a manager at a major global IT HW/SW/Consulting firm. You sir, are correct.

"Turning off" elements - which is BS by the way - does not invalidate the infringement of the underlying architecture. The issue at hand is not the coding, but what the coding does - the meat of the VRNG patents that describe the way it works. Revision doesn't cut the mustard either - GOOG is still infringing. The only way to "work around" the VRNG patents is to develop an entirely new architecture and software schema and dump the existing system.

Is GOOG going to risk the basis of their funding stream Globally do to this - I sure hope not. I want GOOG to succeed - doing so would have a significant material impact on their business."