Replies to post #19475 on Bourque Industries Inc (BORK)

[abcde2]

It would be worth it to evict the lawyers and the accountant immediately. Their actions pre JB and what they have done since he left prove this is BS.

The changing of financial reportings on Eloy after many quartes of established precedent,, the CEO and other share giveaways to themselves with no legal authority nor Board in place, the 2012 Floyd CEO when he wasn't and the lawyers creation at that, the write offs of millions of dollars of legally collectable debts owed by Bourque and Twifotd.

Speaking of accounting and pure conjecture-----JB has in past years had accounts payable debts to Bourque Industries written off against unpaid salaries-----were W2 statements ever issued to him in prior years and were payroll taxes ever witheld or FICA Taxes?

How has the corporate legal and accounting billed out millions of dollars of legal for a company that has generated no business to account for nor contracts either? There are no checks and balances to these officers and key professionals who are paid by the shareholders ironically for their work. Are these the signs of fair representation of the shareholder and company interests?

[Wintermute]

"And if you do a 30 minute Google search on carbon nanotubes and aluminum alloys, you'll find prior art that really calls into question whether BORK actually has any defensible IP. People have been putting C nanotubes into metals for a long time."

Do you have any specific links to real-world applications such as you describe? And patent links too would be helpful, thanks.