InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

zgoldies2

05/07/13 10:03 PM

#113501 RE: Alan Brochstein #113499

Alan, that is some kick arse MJNA DD, thank you.

Missing more than $1 milly ? Hmmmm....I think you are on to something.

Again, excellent post!
icon url

Art Vandeley

05/07/13 10:22 PM

#113502 RE: Alan Brochstein #113499

We already know it will be higher than the 840 as simple math when you add the 47 million shares they gave to canchew to the 808 million it comes out as 855 million.

The other thing I will be looking for is the share-count at the end of Q1. Nobody wants to get in on the betting, but I have said that I will write a positive article on SA about the company if the share-count comes in below 840mm (it ended the year at 808mm).

icon url

ThomasAn

05/07/13 10:40 PM

#113506 RE: Alan Brochstein #113499

This is old news, but it is a good thing you are broadcasting it; it should force some change.

That discrepancy is a guaranteed hint the Q1-Q3 2012 financials will be restated (downwards).
Which means investors have been bidding on inflated financials up to Dec2012.

Maybe that is why the auditor is taking so long; trying to figure out which cracks did the money fall through.

I am really curious to look at the Q1 13 numbers...
icon url

doone

05/08/13 10:00 AM

#113656 RE: Alan Brochstein #113499

It is clearly evident from these posts that you have an aversion for picking up the phone to talk to anyone about learning the facts. Call the TA right now and learn what the SS is.


The other thing I will be looking for is the share-count at the end of Q1. Nobody wants to get in on the betting, but I have said that I will write a positive article on SA about the company if the share-count comes in below 840mm (it ended the year at 808mm).