Replies to post #63134 on Signature Devices Inc. (SDVI)

[hbhmb]

i believe if we " broke even" they suddenly would have felt ok about revealing the settlement. I believe it cost .. and they are to immoral and up front to let the stockholders ( whoever is left )
of this sad, pathetic company to know.


typical mart - bs and hidden agenda crap while he
sips his beer in sweden.

[BeachBum]

Absent of details, I'm left to assume the the new shares authorized are linked to this debt "settlement". If not, there is no reason to not tell shareholders what the exchange was. Who paid Universal or is going to pay Universal and with what? Even though the financials are now being questioned by the company according to a recent PR, there is little money to settle anything imo. If the ask doesn't start getting hit and they traded a CD for the debt, Universal or someone who paid them off is still due I assume. Is there a CD attached to this settlement linked to either Universal of a third party debtor? It's about what they left out, not what the PR states that I question, naturally. Same goes for the "stealth" company Mart PR'ed we acquired which according to the 2012 Q4 report, amounted to little if anything imo. But they USED to bring in $1 mil+ in revenue. What happened between the time this "stealth" company was generating all this income and the time we acquired them. All those employees. And why feature what they used to bring in in 2010 and not what they were generating on the date of close.