InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

porkchop11

05/02/13 8:37 PM

#121093 RE: pphmtoolong #121089

Now that's funny Paul!

Hell yea that would be a great mos # even minus a lil of the hopium!

Good luck!

porkchop11 :O]
icon url

investingdog

05/02/13 8:39 PM

#121094 RE: pphmtoolong #121089

You can't look at the calendar and end of enrollment date trying to estimate MOS. That didn't work for pancreatic trial and it most likely will not work here. Generally the longer we wait the better the MOS could be, but it also depends on how long they sit on the data before making an announcement.
icon url

Protector

05/03/13 5:41 AM

#121109 RE: pphmtoolong #121089

pphmtoolong, are you the inventor of Fuzzy Logic :) (joke)

I just wanted to add that I suspect that PPHM will go over the results multiple times, possibly doing some proactive tests BEFORE announcing results.

If I learned something from the 24th Sept 2nd ln NSCLC announcement then it is that you can as well first make your FDA EOPII homework, check if there are discrepancies and do some random tests( even for an open label clinical trial) before you announce things. It is less nice for us, because we all want to know, but possibly better for our investment :)

I'll be dancing on the table with 15 months and good safety. Every month extra is icing on the pps!