Replies to post #41602 on One Voice Technologies, Inc. (fka OVOE)

[sisyphus_14]

PER SENTENCE 1)...sub topic A)..., which referenced [A A P L]'s

C E O, Tim Cook saying:


"You may be surprised to see what "SIRI" can do in a few, (12),

months..."


A)...FOLKS, {I M H O}, his time is up and it is time for, Tim

Cook to


"SHOW AND TELL...(what "SIRI" can NOW, do)... at [A A P L]'s

World Wide Developer's Conference, .....(10 JUN thru 14 JUN)"! !


B)...THIRTY THREE DAYS AND COUNTING... UNTIL THE

[A A P L] / {O V O E} ANNOUNCEMENTS COME...?.........WHO KNOWS ?


C)...HERE IS A SUMMARY OF MY COMMENTS ABOUT HOW THE BARCLAYS

SECURITY ANALYST SEES IT, AS MY DEFINITION OF Tim Cook's...

M*O*N*S*T*E*R... PERSONIFIED ! !



..B I N G O ! ! .... {7 MAY '13}


Dear Tweety Bird,


PREMISE:

"Apples World Wide Developer's Conference,
...{10 Jun thru 14 Jun}..., is going to be

......................a M*O*N*S*T*E*R ! !"


1)...I could NOT agree with the Barclays

Security Analyst ...any more..., than to

site his own observation and sage analysis

from his 'All Things Digital' quote from

the Article ...dated, [11 Oct '12],


TO WIT:


WHICH IS SISYPHUS'S ...convenient definition...

of "a M*O*N*S*T*E*R" and


my LOGICAL CONCLUSION,


as to ...(HOW and WHEN}... our Remote Control Cat

will be let out of it's surreptitious

and EVER SO, LABORED, ..ten year.. bag:


TO WIT:


"Couldn’t the agent of that disruption be

some other device? At least initially?


Say, ...a Remote Control?


That’s the theory put forth by Barclays

Analyst Ben Reitzes, who suggests that



( AND MOST IMPORTANTLY...! ! ! )

'the fulcrum of Apple’s TV strategy isn’t

the TV itself, but positioning its iOS

devices as interactive TV command centers'.



(CONTINUEING...)

The iPhone and iPad can already wirelessly

stream content to a TV with an attached

Apple TV. Why not further expand those

capabilities?


“With iCloud, we don’t see any reason

why Apple wouldn’t eventually allow an iPad

to be an interface for the TV

— to perform basic computing tasks with a

virtual keyboard like checking emails and

calendars, surfing websites, editing your

PhotoStream and even chat with iMessage,”


...Reitzes explains.


“These tasks would clearly

infringe further on tasks usually earmarked

for desktops and laptops — and the iPad and

Apple TV combination doesn’t even require

Apple to get into the TV market.”


...An interesting theory.


As Reitzes observes, outfitting iOS devices

with functionality like this clearly

enhances their use case.


( AGAIN, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY...! ! )


And if consumers find that enhancement

compelling enough, it could expand Apple’s

total addressable market for iOS devices.

..............................Drastically ! !


2)...AT THE RISK OF BELABORING MY CONCLUSION:


'the fulcrum of Apple’s TV strategy isn’t

the TV itself, ...but positioning... its iOS

devices as ..."([AAPL]'s funnel for their"...

......interactive TV command centers'.


3)...Therefore, THE DEFINITION OF MONSTER IS

..our..

{O V O E} / {A A P L} .....REMOTE CONTROL ! !


Sincerely,

William S Smithson
C E O, Smithson Group

AKA...SISYPHUS

{Who is John Galt ?}