InvestorsHub Logo

arper

04/18/13 12:13 AM

#32129 RE: ive been had #32127

yes, Postyle's (I believe) posting of the transcript was helpful and VRNG has maintained all along that Becker's addendum is nothing new, that it was all presented at trial, including the 3.5 to 5.0% as noted in transcript. The more I read, the more I get the idea that VRNG really IS trying to play reasonably... not requesting the highest figure that could from GOOG, not requiring GOOG to post bond etc......

I think RA's analysis of this Becker thing being a red herring is excellent and to me, seems like GOOG is splitting hairs by saying Becker is constructing a new damages theory cuz he uses I/P Engine and not Lycos....(duh!). And I know I'm smart and have the answers, but HJJ hasn't called me yet to ask for my expert opinion!