I agree, I think it would have looked like the company was taking advantage of a tragedy to sell its product. That could easily ruin a company's image. I saw posts yesterday saying Glenn should be interviewed on TV, again if it appeared he were "hawking" the company's product in light of the tragedy, that would be a very very bad thing in my opinion.
The company is doing the right thing, staying silent. Now, if one of the board of directors members who is a well-known security expert was just interviewed about security in general and changes needed in bomb detection, and happened to mention IMSC in the process as just a small piece of his interview, that in my opinion would be the way to go, possibly. It would not make it look like the company is trying to take advantage of this incident to gain publicity.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
