I guess I can understand people are upset who bought before the reverse split, and in particular CFO brings it on by claiming reverse split would help shareholders. Silly press releases claiming $200million + in value - how do you think people who keep repeating this value will feel if the NPV in a serious study might show only $15 million ? Or CFO puts a second on the mill, and has complete voting control ?
I agree attacking just for sake of attacking doesnt seem productive. Questions though are reasonable.