Replies to post #4174 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[ButtersOnARoll]

Yes,V, nobody disagrees with you that the pre and post-split values are the same, it really is 6 to 1, half dozen to another. But, where I think viewpoints differ is that considering, post split, a $.05 increase on 10K shares is much less than a $.05 increase on 200K shares, regardless of whether the PPS is a $1.00 or $10.00.

The respective post split $ increase relative to shares held is much less, which I think scares some people away from that idea. Although, if selling VP/Digi/Patents is the goal, then split or not, there's no difference. % of ownership is the same, pre or post split.

In favor of your point though, I believe Priceline did something similar during the "dot.bomb" time of 2001, think they did a 1:16 reverse split and look where they are today, over $600 PPS.

[toobigtojail]

I don't see how you can say that management is NOT interested in the PPS. The stock has had a GREAT RUN in the last 4 months, and they have been diligent in dealing with their IP which is the main event, here.

Methinks you expect too much.

[SLICRIC50]

I just went through a 1:20 split with PCFG and it is trading in the Trips...so I say no and no...JMO

[nomorerollbacks]

My name is nomorerollbacks.DO A SEARCH.
I AM A VERY LARGE,SOPHISTICATED,STOCK EXCHANGE ACCREDITED INVESTOR AND HAVE BEEN FOR DECADES ON NUMEROUS BOARDS AND POST ONLY FACTS.
I HAVE HAD AT LEAST 50 STOCKS ROLLBACKED OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS WITH NOT ONE OF THEM INCREASING BACK TO ORIGINAL COST IN VALUE.
I WAS ASSURED OVER 2 YEARS AGO BY VPLM THAT THERE WOULD NEVER BE A ROLLBACK IN VPLM.
I EXIT ALL STOCKS THAT EVEN CONTEMPLATE ROLLBACKS.