InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Lisa aka Viperchick

04/26/01 11:47 AM

#226 RE: Mattu #225

I HAD ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY POSTS ON THIS SITE ABOUT HER UNTIL SHE
DRAGGED ME INTO THE MESS BY ACCUSING ME OF ALL KINDS OF THINGS THAT WERE
UNTRUE.

>>Such is life on the Internet. I get accused of things all the time.


AND WHAT DID YOU DO ABOUT IT WHEN IT HAPPENED TO YOU ON SI ?


Why don't you think about your culpability when you know something isn't true but you allow the statements of fact to stand.
YOU KNEW Jenna's many of Jenna's statements were FALSE and you let the accusations stand and the victims were not allowed to respond because Jenna was deleting the posts. Jenna's behavior exemplifies without a doubt the problems on this site and if you reinstate those posts I think people will have a MUCH better understanding about what some of us already know.


It is not PROVEN that I am Lola as Jenna claims because I am not Lola and you damn well know it. You also have a pretty good idea that I wasnt involved in any of that mess until SHE dragged me into it time and time again and my involvement was ONE post that I made to respond to her absolutely false statements.. ..that she deleted



>>Are either one of you suspended/terminated?


You miss the point. It is not about US being suspended. IT IS ABOUT THE COB behavior and what you think is acceptable.

After mind blowing accusation after accusation..many of which you KNEW were not true...I should have been allowed to respond with the post I made that I copied and pasted in this post...however it was deleted...as I knew it would be
because the VICTIM was not allowed to respond to BS that you KNEW wasn't true.

http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=77409



">>The information was promptly deleted and she should have been suspended. But given the situation,
everybody on the other side of the plate should have been suspended/terminated as well. But that didn't
happen."


Actually, no it wasn't. And after reviewing the posts you knew it was on the site because you were reading and responding to posts....and allowed it to stand for many hours with each incremental second causing more damage.


">>Bottom line is this. Look at her thread today. This is an investment discussion site. What are they talking
about over there now? Stocks. Just what it was intended to be."


really??? How can we know with her history of deleting messages. Also, do you think people should be allowed to question her since she is OBVIOUSLY advertising her service and her site..no matter how subtley or not so subltly she does it. Should people not be allowed to ask her questions. however, if they do..she deletes them.

For example. what about the CSCO call that you made that ended up with many people losing money...

She would delete that post. Shouldn't people be aware that she does cause people to lose money when she seems to promote that her calls are so fantastic.
I was a member of her site and I have the records of just what her calls have and have not done.