I can't believe any patent attorney would suggest that an infringement case nearing its conclusion, at least at the district court level, could be restructured to include a remedy (i.e. injunction) that is not available based on the way the case was litigated. Outside of using a time machine, I can't think of any way to accomplish such a feat.
And patent attorneys are well aware that the sale of any patents includes any encumbrances. And attorneys are well aware of the legal doctrine "res judicata" that inoculates defendants from being sued twice for same thing.
You don't need to apologize for your opinions, please feel free to think whatever you want about share prices and target takeover bids.
However, stating MSFT can go after GOOG for an injunction by acquiring the I/P Engine patents is not an opinion -- it's a factually incorrect statement.