More importantly Judge Wolf doesn't know what the discussions were between the SEC and JBI. That document is supposed to the agreement reached between them. If something that was agreed to was left out of the document, how would the judge know that? He has nothing to compare it to.
"To blame Judge Wolf for a minor ambiguity in settlement documents filed by the SEC is absurd."
I wonder if The Defendant would consider the difference between being "prohibited", which in EVERY case means permanently, or banned for 5 years to be a "minor ambiguity".
The final judgment was flawed and it was signed by the judge. It wasn't a small thing....this so-called "minor ambiguity" rendered the judgment unenforceable. It was WRONG.
Is there some concern that acknowledging his mistake might have a deleterious effect on his disposition in the other case involving The Defendant?
1:12-cv-10495-MLW Grampp v. Bordynuik et al Mark L. Wolf, presiding
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
