Replies to post #14747 on Redwood Scientific Technologies Inc (RSCI)

[gnosis]

how do we know all those touts were employed by GDGI?

and not private stock holders?
not even the levys but their co=conspirators or someone else buying a large block and acting on their own?

again i pose the as yet unanswered question

and again i pose this as yet unaswered question: 38 times huh? did it ever work once since 2012? i believe the answer is no. so in that sense, use of touts would seem to moot, except that a foolish decision to repeat the ineffective could cost scarce money.

and though, ok, the sotck may have been touted 38 times in the past, the only payment i think you will find in the financial reports that looks like it is for stock touts is to the levys. so yeah, the now-convicted fraudsters GDGI unwittinglying hired used touts a lot.

but that does not mean the current CEO will. in fact, he might, as some speculate, be gun shy of touts, and i recall someone saying on this board they had a discussion to that effect with someone at GDGI. is that correct? does anyone recall who it was?

also i agree that a crappy tout wont do much for us
and that is all we can afford and a reputable tout
will not present a hype case and without revenue
we will not see a big benefit

big news, money to pay for good tout, plus good tout
would seem to be excellent and possible

tout without news seems unlikely to me
and unless you can show me different
it seems almost certain to be ineffective

since again, you say 38 touts
i say where did the stock go up significantly on a tout
since jan 2012?

i am curious. it seems like you are not disuaded by these criticisms of your position, so it seems likely you have a rebuttal, but if you have posted it, i missed it or failed to understand how it addressed these points

GDGI - good day to get in
great long term or even mid term (3 months or less) prospects
but you might turn blue if you hold your breath