as an investor that he is, why would he have a negative view to a company that is moving forward in demonstrating the ability to help rid cancer? why not go after scam companies with nothing to show for their existence except false promises? he must feel invincible, or is really a dirty player in getting what he really wants (cheaper shares).
Adam's MO is to be a prick. He generally carries a negative tone towards all bios that he references. Of course, most bios are in an uphill battle, so he is mostly correct when a trial fails. Once he gets on a stock, he won't let up. This past summer he could not stop picking on AMRN -- I just hope ARIA is not his next daily target.