InvestorsHub Logo

jq1234

04/03/13 11:08 PM

#159243 RE: JJM760 #159242

We know what they are. Everyone has his own interpretation, just make sure don't be so sure of everything in drug development, for or against.

By the way, ARIA will now take questions apparently after further thought. Good move IMO, either no cc or cc with Q&A:

http://boardvote.com/symbol/ARIA/communique/286365

poorgradstudent

04/03/13 11:49 PM

#159246 RE: JJM760 #159242

ARIA:

You guys do realize that this Elliot Favus report was a competition sponsored survey, don't you?

This was a smear campaign and a successful one for the time being.



I'll bite. Who was it and what's your proof?

I suspect you just think it's some NVS-fueled effort. That type of conspiratorial thinking is boring.

pcrutch

04/04/13 12:59 AM

#159247 RE: JJM760 #159242

Come off it, sell side reports you have referenced in the past often were surveys from mystery physicians. Skew and bias rampant throughout on both sides. Notice those super bullish sell side survey never disclose payment amounts to participating doctors.