Well BigE, No, I did not get what I wanted at the meeting, in that there was no tangible sign of progress or comprehensive business plan presented. (although it was stated that Dr. Bob wasn't there because he was working on one.) ??
The caution on the part of SS, and especially DD, not to reveal anything that could be construed insider info was very evident, almost chafing. It blocked the candor that they undoubtedly would have liked to have shown if not fearful of legal trouble with the securities police. The filtered information that was offered, though vague, was very encouraging. I got the sense that things are about to break open at least some, and probably by the end of calender year 2013.
Another thing I was looking to discover there was a sense of the personalities of the company officers. I was pleased by their apparent sense of conviction and lack of guile. I really do think that rightly or not, they fervently believe in the future of the company.
So I chose to believe also. A vote against the shares issuance was a vote against progress, and my pittance would not have changed the outcome anyway.
I have decided to hold my current level of stock for the time being. I am very glad the share price hasn't tanked; that for now all those shares sitting over our heads have not affected the market, nor should they. This company is so unknown, so small, and so speculative that is is not affected by conventional technical trading principles.
I'm from Kansas, not Missouri, but I still wish they will show me some progress in the form of a customer soon.
There will be time enough to add shares. If this takes off, getting in even at the $1 level will still be looked on as a clairvoyant move in ten years. So for now, I just try to be patient. As I have often quoted Ernest Holman,
"Today I live in the quiet, joyous expectation of good."
John
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
