InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

P53dragon

03/20/13 5:52 PM

#27387 RE: TheProgressive #27386

I like that, but, as DocF said quite a few times-- once after I asked him about his take on the chance that this batch will reveal positive findings--that he did not really expect it but will be pleasantly surprised, or something to that nature.

I am also 50/50, ok, 60/40 for it to be positive, but let's not work up the frenzy so much that people may lose sleep over it :)

I am also not sure a material event like releasing the data should be presented in an interview setting.
icon url

biomanbaba

03/20/13 6:36 PM

#27389 RE: TheProgressive #27386

So MID MARCH is in the rear view mirror and P21 should slap us on the windshield soon........is that your view?
icon url

alwaysdreaming

03/20/13 8:26 PM

#27408 RE: TheProgressive #27386

I was just talkin to myself today wondering where we/PPS would be today if for not a WSJ article,,,didn't even mention CTIX?


What if a follow up article not only mentioning CTIX but P21/53 improvements hit the press???

Can you say ADIOS Spitsup!
icon url

Whoops

03/20/13 9:33 PM

#27411 RE: TheProgressive #27386

I am liking this theory! Instead of PR'ing the p21 results as normal to small audience such as us, be more national. After all this type of break through in the battle against cancer deserves more than that. Use your leverage of breaking the story to recruit a large news agency to conduct a interview in which you announce the results!

Of course, if your doing all of this the results most be positive!

Just fun speculation..