I see. Now you're bringing in q2.
Of course q2 will be better than q1, ignorant little boy. I never mentioned q2.
Up until now you have been advancing the idiotic idea that people have bought into MWIP in the last several months on the basis of q4 2012 fins, and that non-publication of q4 fins is the main driver of the current pps. That's what you have been posting ad nauseam. Now, when you finally realize that you've done nothing but parade your own gross stupidity in public, you attempt to change the track of your argument to attack MY emphasis on q1, and then to throw in q2 as smoke in mirrors--as if I had ever argued that q2 would not be better than q1. I DARE you to find that in anything I've ever posted, little one.
Q1 WILL be better than q4. You don't know entirely what to expect from q1 and neither does anyone else who isn't a financial officer of the company, just as you wrote of q4 2012. But I guarantee you it will be significantly better than q4 2012 (about which no one gives a damn except you), and that MWIP's PPS will move a great deal when q1 fins are published, almost surely to the upside.
One the one hand you post CONTSANTLY that current non-publication of q4 2012 fins is affecting current pps, and now, in the post to which I'm responding, you talk DOWN the importance of q1 fins--which, by the way, contradicts you second most recent post, in which you tell the board how important q1 estimates in q4 2012 fins are. How can the estimate be important but not the actual q1 fins themselves? So on Planet Malvern, q4 2012 fins are more important to the current pps than consideration of and speculation on q1 2013 fins. That's what your statements boil down to, and I'm trying to decide if you're insane or stupid or both.
Go ahead, post your drool if it makes you happy, if you can possibly make a bigger fool of yourself than you already have, well, I'd like to see it.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
