InvestorsHub Logo

Salvatorey1234

03/12/13 12:06 AM

#91812 RE: bern0911 #91808

Lets assume and think realistically and unrealistically for a second. Is it possible that Llamas, who is no longer legally affiliated with the company, nor convicted of any crime with charges being pushed out of the court system like a parking ticket could cause the justice league to shut the little wooden gate to a multimillion dollar legal PUBLIC entity such as MJNA and lock it with their special key? Skeptic investors seem to be confused about how corporations work with regards to liability. And that's just the facts based on what I've read, no opinion there .

There will likely be wanna-be investors who were running around thinking "why did we sit around pretending the company wasnt making hundreds of millions in a market that could reach the size of the technology sector" is what id be thinking before I'd think of the implausible, at least.

I need a motive for how a company can operate as professionally as MJNA does if its motive wasn't to sell a good product. Readers, I hope you have the opportunity to contact the company, or at least visit their websites if you haven't !!


My prediction wasn't hopeful. It was right on par with reality. I am capable of predicting a bad week and I'm not silly enough to think that this post or any silly analysis post will have enough influence to break even 50 large worth of transactions.

Salvatorey1234

03/12/13 12:30 AM

#91827 RE: bern0911 #91808

Also remember how little volume count actually matters. A stock holding a share price like this without dark side influence is impressive. So 10,000,000 weren't sold and bought the same day to scalp thousandths of pennies and/or artificially inflate the volume. Doesn't help the stock any. MJNA is doing just fine on low volume, doesn't matter even a little bit how much volume there is, as there only need be more buyers than sellers...and today the low volume you criticized brought more buyers than sellers
For the third day in a row. Again, my analysis wasnt hopeful. Well, not completely! ;) I mean it wasnt like some of the other analysis on here. It gave reason. Breaking .40 mid April was the hopeful part.