if "we" means WGAS, then "we" are not drilling for oil.
"we" are not drilling for anything.
"we" do not have anywhere to drill, because "we" don't have any free and clear rights to any leases, and "we" don't have anything except a commitment letter/pre-approval that has been dangled as a lure for investors for a long time, and that most certainly has significant contingencies attached to it before "we" have access to any funds.
will "we" be able to survive long enough for the litigation to be finally resolved? who the heck knows? and not only do "we" need to survive long enough for the litigation to be resolved, but "we" need to hope and pray that it is resolved in "our" favor, or "we" are toast.
meanwhile, Toxic Charlie has an exit strategy, but the shareholders would be hung out to dry. I doubt he can raise any money through WGAS - too much debt and litigation baggage. he would be better off making a clean break and a new start. how many new corporations has Toxic Charlie formed in the last few months anyway, while he should have been taking care of WGAS business?