InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Carboat

02/27/13 6:30 PM

#114278 RE: geocappy1 #114276

No i believe they were just dropped from the dataset not resolved as to their status (which is appropriate if they are censored) I didn't bring it up btw but it would be nice if company were more transparrent on this issue. Makes no diif to me as I will buy in if it approaches $1 and stay on sidelines if it moves higher. I hope all make money here as mgmt certainly has taken more than their share between high salaries, given the size and output of comapny, and their questionable option pricing.
icon url

exwannabe

02/27/13 7:52 PM

#114297 RE: geocappy1 #114276

It is a certainty that the change in MOS was due to some censors being resolved.

Most of these will just be events that happened in the entervening 3 months bewteen data snapshots.

It is certainly quite possible that some of those early censors also got resolved. Clearing 3 or 4 of those would certainly remove any issue in my mind on that subject.

They will probably not release this information prior to the full data being presented.

P.S., to another poster who replied to you, censors are NOT deleted from the data. This trial was the full ITT (intent to treat) set. a patient would count once they were enrolled even if they were shot by a gun prior to receiving treatment. Even in an analysis that uses a modified ITT population censors are not deleted. The patients not in the data are simply deleted, but that is not a censor.