it was an "anti-hit-piece", read what I was replying to.....never said it came from the Co......it was a rebuttal example of what I see as a TRUE abuse, no matter who wrote it....when someone claims an EPS number, it goes beyond opinion, no???
but I did note that the previous CEO had reported a past contact from the author (before it was written, it seems), according to posts made here......just pointing it out.....