Replies to post #65900 on NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[leifsmith]

Strong second. Thanks. Of course, constructive criticism should be welcome, especially if accompanied by a proposal for a different course of action. It's true that this is about money, and it's also true that it's about a great deal more than money.

[Nanotoday]

I am not cheering for NNVC's failure. I honestly hope they succeed, it would be very financially rewarding for me and would alleviate much human suffering.

But to ignore basic tenants of science, medicine and business, say they don't apply to NNVC, and ignore grievous inconsistencies and inaccuracies (and that is being kind) doesn't help anyone.

I have seen the horrors of HIV and I often feel this company is "playing the humanity card".

My harshness is directed at those who intentionally use obfuscation, distraction and confusion to create false expectations and unrealistic outcomes. That means the folks here who systematically and cooperatively squelch any attempt to hold this company responsible or point out the numerous falsehoods and inconsistencies. Maybe that's OK if you're just trying to get rich, but not if you're trying to stay alive.

So who's more sympathetic to those with Kaposii Sarcoma, a skeptical critic of the company or a blind follower?