InvestorsHub Logo

F6

02/20/13 6:31 AM

#198551 RE: fuagf #198549

Senate Minority Leader Fooled by Report in Military Version of The Onion

02.19.13
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/02/mcconnell-duffel-blog/ [with comments]

fuagf

03/11/13 5:56 PM

#199345 RE: fuagf #198549

Experts say U.S. debt woes are manageable, especially in short term

By Don Lee and Jim Puzzanghera Chicago Tribune
Posted: Sunday, February 3, 2013 12:01 a.m.

WASHINGTON — Listening to the political shouting match and seeing Washington lurch from one fiscal crisis to another, you might think the federal budget deficit is the economic equivalent of a giant meteor hurtling toward America, about to hit any day.

The reality is quite different. In fact, the debt is probably not even the country’s biggest economic challenge, most experts say, and certainly not the most urgent.

The evidence shows that the country is on a course of spending and debt accumulation that could lead to serious trouble not today or tomorrow but probably 10 to 20 years down the road.

Nothing like Greece

What the evidence does not show is that such a crisis is close at hand or that the U.S. is in any imminent danger of turning into an economic basket case like present-day Greece.

Moreover, financial experts agree that although America’s burgeoning health care costs pose huge long-term challenges for the budget, the nation’s debt could most likely be controlled for at least the next decade by making a series of relatively moderate policy changes.

Those changes, although perhaps unwelcome, would not require drastic adjustments in the lives of most Americans.

Yet the bitterly partisan argument over the deficit and the national debt will surely burst forth again in coming weeks.

Congress barely avoided the full “fiscal cliff” of spending cuts and tax hikes at year’s end, and Republican lawmakers last week merely delayed until this summer another showdown with the White House over the debt ceiling.

The next budget flash points are even closer: Mandatory spending cuts, the so-called sequester, are set to take effect March 1, followed by the March 27 deadline when spending authority must be renewed or the government could be shut down.

“Fiscal policy is a mess,” said analysts at Macroeconomic Advisers, a major forecasting firm. “The debt ceiling, the sequester and the expiring budget resolution comprise a three-pack of uncertainties that in the near term is bad for the economy.”

Yet separate the economic wheat from the political chaff, and the solution is not that hard.

Over the last two years policymakers have enacted measures cutting almost $2.4 trillion from projected deficits over the next decade. Most of that deficit reduction came from reductions in federal programs approved as part of the debt ceiling deal in 2011.

About $650 billion of the total comes from new revenue generated by tax increases on the wealthy that were part of last month’s fiscal cliff deal.

Manageable stability

Taken together, economists and budget experts reckon, an additional $1 trillion to $1.4 trillion in savings would be enough to stabilize the national debt as a share of the overall economy. That would be achieved by bringing the deficit down to 2.5 percent of the country’s annual gross domestic product, about one-third the share last year.

“That’s manageable; we’ve done a big chunk already,” said Roberton Williams, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. “You can do that by raising taxes a little bit more or by cutting spending. ... That’s something that’s doable.”

Moody’s Analytics economist Mark Zandi, who regularly advises Democratic and Republican lawmakers, agreed.

Even if the bulk of the additional deficit savings needed came from reduced spending as opposed to higher taxes, he said, those cuts could be done by “tweaking programs,” such as changing the inflation index for Social Security, aligning Medicare drug payments with Medicaid and reducing some farm subsidies.

“It wouldn’t be a wrenching restructuring,” he said.

So why the frequent paroxysms in Washington over the debt and the 11th-hour deals to avert seeming disaster?

In large part, the fight over deficits and spending has become a surrogate for battles over basic political and ideological disagreements over the role of government and, behind the scenes, over how the economic pie should be divided. There also are some real differences in how people view the debt and the risks to the economy.

http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20130203/PC1601/130209800/1263/experts-say-us-debt-woes-are-manageable-especially-in-short-term&source=RSS